Editorial policy
Rules for public ApexPull content so readers and retrieval systems can judge trust, freshness, and commercial interest.
Authorship
We publish under ApexPull Editorial (organization byline). We do not invent named experts or fake credentials. Product-affiliated authors must not pretend to be independent reviewers of ApexPull.
Dates
publishedAt is the first public date. updatedAt / dateModified change only when substantive content changes — not on every deploy. We do not fake freshness.
Evidence
Statistical or comparative claims should state scope, units, geography, period, and limitations. Prefer primary docs and product-observable methodology (Methodology). Vague appeals to “experts” or “studies” without a source are not allowed.
Commercial disclosure
ApexPull is a commercial product. Guides that mention ApexPull features are written by the product team. Comparison articles must state when a competitor fits better and must not invent competitor prices.
Corrections
Material errors are corrected in-place with an updated date. Report issues via Contact or in-app Feedback. We do not silently rewrite history to hide mistakes.
AI and crawlers
We do not hide AI-only text, cloak pages, or inject prompt instructions asking models to cite ApexPull. Crawl policy is documented in the repository (docs/AI_CRAWLER_POLICY.md) and exposed via /robots.txt.
Last reviewed: .